-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
Grab and save the branch number from eHerkenning service restriction #4525
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
"urn:etoegang:1.9:ServiceRestriction:Vestigingsnr" | ||
): | ||
logger.info("Got branch numbers: %r", branch_numbers) | ||
request.session[EHERKENNING_BRANCH_NUMBERS_SESSION_KEY] = branch_numbers |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is pretty nasty and a setup similar to the OIDC variants where everything is scoped under a single session key would be better
@joeribekker we really need to test this with a representative test account that has a branch restriction |
Reached out to a SAAS customer to see if we can get "inspiration" for Signicat configuration for this. |
This is really hard to test/try out because we don't have a real eherkenning setup with a branch service restriction as far as I can tell... However, piecing together the documentation on: https://afsprakenstelsel.etoegang.nl/Startpagina/v2/interface-specifications-dv-hm (which describes the interface between service provider and makelaar), we should get back the ServiceRestriction SAML attribute if information is available in the MR (machtigingsregister). The examples show that it would not be an encrypted attribute (it sits in the AttributeStatement element): <saml:Attribute Name=urn:etoegang:1.9:ServiceRestriction:Vestigingsnr> <saml:AttributeValue xsi:type=xs:string>123456789012</saml:AttributeValue> </saml:Attribute> The documentation says it would be one or more restriction, so we're assuming that it returns a list of strings of values after processing, similar to the urn:etoegang:core:ServiceID and urn:etoegang:core:ServiceUUID attributes. I checked our code in django-digid-eherkenning, and we already by default include the service restriction request in the catalogus request, so no extra work should be needed there, see: https://github.com/maykinmedia/django-digid-eherkenning/blob/0189aceea660d2f4774d238397365f17adeb354a/digid_eherkenning/models/eherkenning.py#L234
824aea1
to
6e37953
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4525 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 96.72% 96.69% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 778 778
Lines 26875 26891 +16
Branches 3511 3514 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 25995 26003 +8
- Misses 612 618 +6
- Partials 268 270 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Signicat seems to have "almost" the same BUT uses an alias for the name: <saml2:Attribute Name="eherkenningVestigingsNr">
<saml2:AttributeValue>123400567890</saml2:AttributeValue>
</saml2:Attribute> |
Closes #3967
[skip: e2e]
This is really hard to test/try out because we don't have a real eherkenning setup with a branch service restriction as far as I can tell...
However, piecing together the documentation on:
https://afsprakenstelsel.etoegang.nl/Startpagina/v2/interface-specifications-dv-hm (which describes the interface between service provider and makelaar), we should get back the ServiceRestriction SAML attribute if information is available in the MR (machtigingsregister). The examples show that it would not be an encrypted attribute (it sits in the AttributeStatement element):
The documentation says it would be one or more restriction, so we're assuming that it returns a list of strings of values after processing, similar to the urn:etoegang:core:ServiceID and urn:etoegang:core:ServiceUUID attributes.
I checked our code in django-digid-eherkenning, and we already by default include the service restriction request in the catalogus request, so no extra work should be needed there, see: https://github.com/maykinmedia/django-digid-eherkenning/blob/0189aceea660d2f4774d238397365f17adeb354a/digid_eherkenning/models/eherkenning.py#L234
Changes
Checklist
Check off the items that are completed or not relevant.
Impact on features
Release management
I have updated the translations assets (you do NOT need to provide translations)
./bin/makemessages_js.sh
./bin/compilemessages_js.sh
Commit hygiene